Sending Office: Honorable Pramila Jayapal
Sent By:

        Request for Signature(s)

Endorsed by: National Immigrant Justice Center, Women’s Refugee Commission, Young Center for Immigrant Children’s Rights

Current Cosigners (15)Jayapal, Thompson (MS), Lofgren, Cárdenas, Cummings, Danny K. Davis, DeGette, DeSaulnier, Gallego, Gutiérrez, Langevin, Lujan Grisham, McGovern, Nadler, Norton

Dear Colleague:

           Please join us in urging Homeland Security Appropriators to reject a blanket policy of separating families at the border and instead restore funding for alternatives to detention, including the Family Case Management Program (FCMP).

            Just last week, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a class-action lawsuit accusing the U.S. government of “forcible separation of parents from their young children for no legitimate reason” in violation of federal law and the due
process clause.[1] One of the named plaintiffs in the case is a mother and her seven-year-old child, who came to the United States seeking asylum,
and were held separately for nearly four months.[2]

            DHS has many proven alternatives to detention that could be used, including ICE’s now-terminated Family Case Management Program (FCMP). The FCMP pilot had compliance rates of 99 percent with immigration requirements such as court hearings and
immigration appointments, at a cost of only $36 per day per family,[3] compared to $298 per day per bed in family detention.[4]

            Please join me in sending a letter urging appropriators to include language to limit DHS’s ability to use appropriated funds to separate parents from their children absent evidence that the parent poses an immediate threat to the child’s safety
as well as robust funding for alternatives to detention, such as the Family Case Management Program (FCMP).

            To sign on, please contact Jennifer Chan ( in Congresswoman Jayapal’s office, Maunica Sthanki (
with the Judiciary Committee, or Alexandra Carnes ( with the Committee on Homeland Security by COB Thursday, March 15.



PRAMILA JAYAPAL                       BENNIE G. THOMPSON                ZOE LOFGREN                                                 
Member of Congress                         Member of Congress                       Member of Congress


March XX, 2018

The Honorable John Carter                                       The Honorable Lucille Roybal-Allard
Chairman                                                                   Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Homeland Security                       Subcommittee on Homeland Security
Committee on Appropriations                                   Committee on Appropriations
B-307 Rayburn House Office Building                     2083 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515                                           Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Chairman Carter and Ranking Member Roybal-Allard:

            As you develop the Fiscal Year 2019 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Appropriations bill, we urge you to limit DHS’s ability to use appropriated funds to separate parents from their children absent evidence that the parent poses an immediate
threat to the child’s safety. Instead, we ask that you include robust funding for alternatives to detention, such as the Family Case Management Program.

            Congress appropriates funding to DHS for border security and processing.  Many parents arrive at our borders with their children to seek protection—a lawful act.  In the last several years, the numbers of such families apprehended at our southern
border has increased.[5] Overwhelming evidence shows this is driven by rising levels of violence and persecution in their home countries.[6] We
believe that in a misguided attempt to reduce these numbers, DHS has been separating families with the hope that cruel treatment at our borders will send a message to and deter future migrants.[7]

This tactic is not only cruel, inflicting harm on children and their parents,[8] but destined to fail.  The majority of arriving families come
from Central America, where incredibly high levels of violence, often conducted with impunity, threaten the lives and safety of women and children.[9] 
The risks in their home countries—and their need for lifesaving protection—is so great that nothing will stop them from fleeing to the United States.  But this is not an illegal act. Congress has created laws that require DHS to process and evaluate claims
for humanitarian protection.[10]  DHS cannot circumnavigate congressional intent.

Family separation re-traumatizes parents and children escaping harrowing danger, and it ignores the reality that many of these parents and children have valid claims for relief.  The availability of this relief is hampered by the separation
of parents and children, and their detention in different facilities, often hundreds of miles away from each other and in different immigration court jurisdictions.  Such parents are often grief stricken, worried, and traumatized, affecting their ability to
present their case in legal proceedings.  And children, some of whom are as young as 2 years old, are simply unable to provide the facts necessary to avail themselves of legal protection. 

Additionally, separation inflicts direct harm upon children. Children who have fled violence in their home country suddenly lose their entire world when their parent is ripped away from them. Children’s ability to trust, communicate their wishes, and create
healthy relationships is severely handicapped when they are separated from parents.[11] In January, more than 200 child welfare, juvenile justice
and child development organizations expressed their opposition to the practice of separating parents and children as a matter of immigration policy.[12] The
American Academy of  Pediatrics encourages DHS to reject a policy of family separation, stating:

Fear and stress, particularly prolonged exposure to serious stress without the buffering protection afforded by stable, responsive relationships—known as toxic stress—can harm the developing brain and harm short- and long-term health. Pediatricians work
to keep families together in times of strife because we know that in any time of anxiety and stress, children need to be with their parents, family members and caregivers.”[13] 

As DHS’s own Advisory Committee on Family Residential Centers concluded, it is never in the best interests of a child to be detained because of immigration status.[14]

            Attorneys from around the country have communicated that family separation is currently occurring on a regular basis. We believe that the Administration is threatening to institute a blanket policy requiring the separation of all families.[15]  This
is an inhumane practice that must end now.  

Detaining parents and children together as a family unit is a similarly harmful and unnecessary alternative.  Immigration detention is growing at an unprecedented rate despite more humane, cost-effective alternatives. This growth comes despite ample proof
that immigration detention traumatizes vulnerable populations, jeopardizes the basic health and safety of those detained, and undermines meaningful access to counsel in isolated, remote facilities. The harm inflicted on families by immigration detention, especially
on the welfare and development of children, is well-documented.[16]

The solution to the cruel inhumanity of family separation cannot be the alternative—and costly—cruelty of family detention. Instead, DHS must act with humanity and fiscal responsibility by prioritizing a spectrum of alternatives to detention, beginning by
restoring the Family Case Management Program (FCMP).

The law already requires Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to detain only when necessary to mitigate flight risk or danger to the community. Alternatives to detention are just that—alternatives—that allow ICE to mitigate flight risk while reducing
reliance on costly institutional incarceration. The now-terminated FCMP pilot had compliance rates of 99 percent with immigration requirements, such as court hearings and immigration appointments, at a cost of only $36 per day per family,[17] compared
to $298 per day per bed in family detention.[18]  For just a fraction of the cost of detaining a family in prison-like settings, the
FCMP ensured that asylum-seeking parents and their children complied with their immigration obligations by helping them find legal representation, guiding them through the court system, and connecting them with other community resources.  Moreover, while restoring
the FCMP would provide a critical cost-saving and humane mechanism for processing asylum-seeking families, DHS already has a menu of cost-saving alternatives to detention available, including release on recognizance, parole, or bond, as well as other existing
alternatives-to-detention programs. Despite claims to the contrary, DHS already has the necessary tools to make both the humane and the fiscally responsible choice—to neither separate nor detain families seeking protection in the United States, absent evidence
of immediate threat to safety.   

            We respectfully request that the DHS FY 2019 Appropriations bill make it clear that no funds may be used to support the ongoing and increasing use of family separation as a means of deterring future migration. We also strongly urge you to include
funding for the FCMP as a cost-efficient and effective alternative to detention.



[1] Ariane de Vogue & Tal Kopan, ACLU class action lawsuit seeks to block immigrant family separations, CNN (Mar. 9, 2018)
 available at:

[2] Derek Hawkins, A mother and child fled Congo fearing death. ICE has held them separately for months, lawsuit says., Washington Post
(Feb. 27, 2018) available at:

[3] Frank Bajak, ICE Shutters Detention Alternative for Asylum-Seekers, U.S. News (June 9, 2017) available at:

[4] Julia Edwards, New U.S. migrant detention center to be run by firm criticized by advocates, Reuters (Sept. 23, 2014) available at:

[5] U.S. Customs and Border Protection, “United States Border Patrol: Total Family Unit Apprehensions by Month – FY 2013,” (Dec. 2017) available

[6] See, e.g. Adriana Beltrán, Children and Families Fleeing Violence in Central America, WOLA (Feb. 21, 2017) available at:;
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Women on the Run (Oct. 2015) available at:;
UNHCR, Children on the Run (2014) available at:

[7] John Burnett, To Curb Illegal Immigration, DHS Separating Families at the Border, NPR (Feb. 27, 2018) available at:

[8] Ariane de Vogue & Tal Kopan, ACLU Class Action Lawsuit Seeks to Block Immigrant Family Separations, CNN (Mar. 9, 2018) available

[9] Kids in Need of Defense (KIND), Neither Security nor Justice: Sexual and Gender-Based Violence and Gang Violence in El Salvador, Honduras,
and Guatemala

[10] INA of 1965, Pub. L. 89-236, available at:

[11] See, e.g., Luis H. Zayas and Laurie Cook Heffron, Disrupting Young Lives: How Detention and Deportation affect U.S.-born
children of Immigrants
, American Psychological Association Newsletter  (Nov. 2016), available at (“Migration-related
family separation, particularly between mother and child, has negative psychological impacts on both children and parents that persist even after reunification”) (citations omitted). See also American Psychological Assn, Parents and Caregivers
are Essential to Children’s Healthy Development
, available at (parents “provide the most intimate context for
the nurturing and protection of children as they develop their personalities and identities and also as they mature physically, cognitively, emotionally, and socially.”).

[12] MaryLee Allen, Children’s Defense Fund, Letter to Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen on Behalf of 200 Organizations,  Jan. 16, 2018,
available at:

[13] Colleen A. Kraft, MD, FAAP, Letter to Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen, March 1, 2018.

[14] Report of the DHS Advisor Committee on Family Residential Centers, Dept. of Homeland Security (Sept. 30, 2016) available at:

[15] Caitlin Dickerson & Ron Nixon, Trump Administration Considers Separating Families to Combat Illegal Immigration, N.Y. Times (Dec.
21, 2017) available at:

[16] See generally, Olga Byrne & Eleanor Acer, Family Detention: Still Happening, Still Damaging, Human Rights First (Oct.
2015) available at: .

[17] Frank Bajak, ICE Shutters Detention Alternative for Asylum-Seekers, U.S. News (June 9, 2017) available at:

[18] Julia Edwards, New U.S. migrant detention center to be run by firm criticized by advocates, Reuters (Sept. 23, 2014) available

Related Legislative Issues

Selected legislative information:Appropriations, Homeland Security, Immigration, Judiciary

icon eDC logo e-Dear Colleague version 2.0