Sending Office: Honorable Donald S. Beyer, Jr.
Reject FY 2018 Appropriations Riders that Undermine the Endangered Species Act and Wildlife Conservation
Deadline: This Wednesday, Dec. 6!
Please join us in sending the below letter to Speaker Paul Ryan and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi urging them to ensure that harmful provisions undermining endangered species conservation in H.R. 3354 – the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2018 – are not included in the final spending legislation for FY 2018.
The Endangered Species Act is a bedrock conservation law that has helped many species recover from the brink of extinction, including the bald eagle, the brown pelican, and the humpback whale. Indeed, ninety-nine percent of species that have been listed
under the Endangered Species Act have escaped extinction.
However, the FY 2018 Interior/EPA bill contains several provisions that undermine the goals of the Endangered Species Act, including provisions that would prevent the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from taking any steps to list the sage-grouse; defund recovery
measures for gray wolves through the entire continental Untied States; and void a federal rule conserving bears and wolves on national preserves in Alaska.
To sign on, please contact Mackenzie Landa in Rep. Beyer’s office (firstname.lastname@example.org) or Greg Sunstrum in Rep. Dingell’s office (email@example.com).
Donald. S. Beyer Jr. Debbie Dingell
Member of Congress Member of Congress
Re: Reject FY 2018 Appropriations Riders that Undermine the Endangered Species Act
Dear Speaker Ryan and Minority Leader Pelosi:
We write to express our great concern over a number of harmful provisions in H.R. 3354 – the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2018 (“Make America Secure and Prosperous Act, 2018”) – that would undermine endangered
species conservation and threaten one of our country’s most important wildlife conservation laws – the Endangered Species Act. We urge you to ensure that these controversial and far-reaching provisions are not included in final spending legislation for FY
The appropriations process has become a perennial magnet for provisions and amendments that seek to make significant changes to U.S. environmental policies. Rather than taking their policy proposals to the appropriate authorizing committees, many members
have instead opted to insert them into appropriations bills, often without full consideration by Congress. These misguided efforts weigh down the important process to fund the federal government. We object to these policy provisions – especially those provisions
that threaten American’s air, water, wildlife, and public lands. This letter focuses on the seven provisions currently in H.R. 3354 aimed at weakening the Endangered Species Act – a law that continues to serve as our nation’s most effective law in protecting
wildlife in danger of extinction. We also strongly oppose a provision that would block implementation of critical rules developed by the National Park Service to regulate non-subsistence hunting in Alaska national preserves.
When Congress passed the Endangered Species Act with near-unanimous consent, species were struggling to survive in the face of unmitigated human-caused threats to their existence. Since the Endangered Species Act was enacted, many of these species have rebounded
over the course of just a few decades, including the bald eagle, the brown pelican and the humpback whale. Ninety-nine percent of species that have been listed under the Endangered Species Act have escaped the final fate of extinction, and many are once again
thriving. We have a moral responsibility to continue to be good stewards of our environment and protect our natural resources for future generations. That translates into maintaining a strong federal Endangered Species Act that relies on sound science to guide
decision-making. Polling shows that 90 percent of American voters support the Endangered Species Act and 71 percent believe scientists should make decisions about how to protect imperiled species, not politicians.
Nevertheless, the underlying FY 2018 Interior/EPA bill that passed out of the Appropriations Committee contained three riders that undermine endangered species conservation by singling out certain imperiled species and denying them the protections of the
Endangered Species Act. One would continue for a fourth year a rider that prevents the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) from taking any steps to list the sage-grouse under the Endangered Species Act. In September 2015, FWS determined that the greater
sage-grouse was not warranted for listing under the Endangered Species Act, citing an unprecedented landscape-scale planning process as reducing threats to sage grouse – plans that will almost certainly be weakened under a new process initiated by Interior
Secretary Ryan Zinke. This amendment would prevent an ESA listing for the sage-grouse, even if it declines closer to extinction. Another would block Endangered Species Act protections for wolves in the Midwest, reaffirm a court decision that delisted wolves
in Wyoming, and obstruct citizens’ ability to go to court to challenge these delistings. Still another provision would go so far as to defund recovery measures for gray wolves throughout the entire continental United States, even though wolves currently inhabit
only 15 percent of their historic range. This same provision would also block all spending on recovery efforts for the Mexican gray wolves, even though there are just 113 individual animals left in the United States and 35 in Mexico. The job of restoring wolves
to still-suitable habitat across the United States – as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has done for other wide-ranging species like the bald eagle – is far from done. The bill only got worse on the floor, when 3 additional riders that would undermine the
Endangered Species Act and harm threatened and endangered species conservation were added to the bill. Finally, Representative Don Young added an amendment that would void a federal rule conserving bears and wolves on national preserves in Alaska. If this
language is enacted, the National Park Service would not be able to prevent unsportsmanlike hunting practices on lands under its own jurisdiction, including spotlighting denning bears and cubs as they hibernate.
We urge you to use your positions of leadership to uphold our nation’s legacy of protecting our natural heritage for future generations of Americans and reject the inclusion of any of these attacks on the Endangered Species Act and wildlife in any final
bill to fund the federal government. Thank you for your consideration.
Cc: The Honorable Rodney Frelinghuysen, The Honorable Nita Lowey
e-Dear Colleague version 2.0